The facts in brief are as under: Laxman (hereinafter referred as deceased) was the husband of Smt. Geetha, PW.2, and son of brother of the de facto complainant Narsing Rao, PW.1. Venkata Ramana Murthy, PW.3 and Venkata Laxman are the sons of Smt. Sharada, PW.4.
VPUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Order: The Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is fled on behalf af the petitioner herein to grant anticipatory ball in connection with Come No.48 af 2024 of Bulivenduja Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Secfions 469, 471 ...
AP V. Vijay Kumar1 - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses a case regarding a rule in Andhra Pradesh that reserves 30% of public posts for women. The key legal issues are whether this rule violates Articles 14 or 16(4) of the Indian Constitution. The court determined that the rule is a valid …
Event Details: - A workshop on the Mitigation of Environmental Pollution in AP was held on the 9th October, 2024 with NGOs at. Vijayawada. Sri K. Pawan Kalyan, Hon'ble Deputy Chief Minister for EFS&T and PR, RD & RWS, was the chief guest inaugurated the workshop. The Dr.P.Krishnaiah, IAS (Retd.), Chairman of APPCB was Guest of Honor. ...
The court in Subhash Kumar v State of Bihar held that the right to life includes the right to enjoy pollution-free water and air. However, the petition was dismissed due to a lack of evidence directly linking the pollution to the respondents, emphasising the need for concrete proof in environmental claims.
Sirikoti Narayana Rao and others V/S A.P. Pollution Control Board INTRODUCTION In the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad Sirikoti Narayana Rao and others Versus A.P. Pollution Control Board On February 22, 2007 Bench - G.S. SINGHVI, C.J. AND C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY,
UDAY KUMAR DAS Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & OTHERS. LAWS(GAU)- HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI. Decided on November 12,2013 UDAY KUMAR DAS Appellant. VERSUS State of Assam and Others Respondents. Referred Judgements :- LOHIT CHANDRA KALITA V. STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO] UNION OF INDIA JUSTICE S S SANDHAWALIA RETD …
Uday Kumar Singh challenged the election of the appellant by way of an election petition on the sole ground that the counting of the votes was done illegally and against law. 4. It was pleaded in the election petition that 339 valid ballot papers in favour of the petitioner were neither counted nor rejected by the Counting Supervisor. 35 valid ...
The facts giving rise to the above question is that a charge-sheet was filed against the petitioners herein alleging commission of offences punishable under sections 408 and 201 of Indian Penal Code. In the course of the trial, the prosecution 3 filed an application under section 242(2) of Cr.P.C. seeking to produce 17 documents enumerated in ...
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Lg Polymers India Private Limited vs Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 15 June, 2020 Bench: Uday Umesh Lalit, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Vineet Saran 1 ITEM NO.7+8 VIRTUAL COURT NO.2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary 1327/2020 (Arising out of …
Section 25 and 26 of Water Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1974. Article 226 of the Indian Constitution, 1950. Petitioner: Subhash Kumar v/s Respondent: State of Bihar and Ors. Before the High Court of Bihar AIR 1991 SC 420 Date of Judgement: 09 January 1991 Bench: Justice K.N. Singh; Justice N.D. Ojha Arguments Advanced:
Sri K. Uday Kumar (9.88 Acres or 3.998 Ha.) submitted an application to the Board vide reference 3 rd cited seeking Consent for Establishment (CFE) to carryout semi mechanized open cast …
2. The assessee, Sri Sambandam Uday Kumar, filed his return of income for the year 2006-07 on October 11, 2006, declaring an income of Rs. 2,13,68,271. The case was selected for scrutiny. Notices under section 143(2) and 142(1) were issued to the assessee. In response to the above notices the authorised representative of the assessee appeared ...
This suit is filed by Plaintiff for declaring his name as 'Uday Kumar L.V' and his father's name as 'Venktesh B.T' and for directing Defendants to make necessary correction in school records. 2) Plaintiff's case is that Plaintiff is the son of Sri.Venktesh.B.T. He is presently working as Technical Assistant in Reliance Media Ltd., Bengaluru. ...
P. Gopinath S. Uday Kumar. Medical and Health Sciences; Published Filed ; Magnetic-field actuated hybrid nanofiber scaffold and apparatus for 4D tissue engineering. P. Gopinath S. Uday Kumar. Medical and Health Sciences; Published ...
A petition/application to draw final decree is not a plaint and need not contain the material facts as specified under Order 7 Rule 1 of CPC. Further Order 20 Rule 18 CPC do not specify as to what are the particulars to be mentioned in a petition/application to draw the final decree. Therefore in our considered view a petition/application ...
Subhash Kumar v. the State of Bihar (1991) The Supreme Court of India in the well-known case of Subhash Kumar v. the State of Bihar (1991) clarified the fact that public interest litigation cannot include any personal interest of the person submitting a PIL before the court of law. In the present case, the petitioner had filed a writ petition before the top court by …
In Supreme Court of India Writ Petition (Civil) 7832 of 1997 Citation 1994 (3) SCC 1 Petitioner A.P. Pollution Control Board Respondent Prof. M.V. Nayudu (Retd.) & Others Date of Judgement 27/01/1999 Bench …
A.N Venugopala Gowda, J.:— These two second appeals were brought under Section 100 CPC from a common judgment and separate decree(s) passed by the Senior Civil Judge at Yadgir, whereby the dismissal of suit for declaration and mandatory injunction and for restoration of the property to the plaintiff was maintained and the decree for permanent …
View Uday Kumar's profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members. Around 8 years of technical experience in designing and developing client/server…
Get AP Pollution Control Board-II v. Prof. MV Nayudu, (2001) 4 LRI 657 (1 December 2000), India Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Study Aids . Product overview. Product overview. Pricing and free trial.
The Supreme Court relied on the judgement of Uday v. State of Karnataka and stated that . The prosecutrix (19 years) had adequate intelligence and maturity to understand the significance and morality of the sexual act. ... One of the recent cases was Manoj Kumar Arya v. State of Uttarakhand (2024). In this case, the complainant was involved in ...
Details of Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Ors (1991) Name of the Case- Subhash Kumar v.State of Bihar (1991). Date of Judgement- 9th January, 1991 Type of case- Writ Petition (Civil) by the way of Public Interest Litigation Court- Supreme Court of India Bench- Justice K.N. Singh and Justice N.D. Ojha Author of the Judgement- Justice K.N. Singh Name …
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-C. S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1291/2023 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2022 in CRP No. 201254/2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi). UDAY KUMAR Petitioner(s)
Pursuant thereto, the State Government by order dated 8.5.2020 appointed a Committee comprising of five officers including Member-Secretary of the State Pollution Control Board. …
Lg Polymers India Private Limited vs Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 15 June, 2020 Bench: Uday Umesh Lalit, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Vineet Saran
The A.P. Pollution Control Board vide reference 3rd cited, received an application for Consent for Operation of M/s. Sri K. Uday Kumar (9.88 Acres or 3.998 Ha.), Sy.No. 31 (P), Veerlagunapadu (V), Ozili (M), SPSR Nellore District to carryout Mining of Road Metal – 68350 m³ / annum in an
Respondents 6 to 10 have planted approximately 200 to 300 saplings on 4-8-2006 in their units within 50 metres radius in compliance with the directions of this Court. The Court …
Legal India Legal India : Latest Law News, Legal Articles, Law Directory, Legal Helpline
He, therefore, held that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant had sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix without her consent and was, therefore, guilty of the offence of rape punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court in appeal affirmed the finding of the trial court substantially for the same ...